Testing for parallel, intersecting, skew, and perpendicular lines

 
 
Parallel, intersecting, skew, and perpendicular lines blog post.jpeg
 
 
 

Two lines can be parallel, intersecting, or skew

To determine whether two lines are parallel, intersecting, skew or perpendicular, we will need to perform a number of tests on the two lines.

Krista King Math.jpg

Hi! I'm krista.

I create online courses to help you rock your math class. Read more.

 

Given two lines,

 
equations of two parametric lines
 

then the lines are

parallel if the ratio equality is true.

b1b2=d1d2=f1f2\frac{b_1}{b_2}=\frac{d_1}{d_2}=\frac{f_1}{f_2}

intersecting if the lines are not parallel or if you can solve them as a system of simultaneous equations.

perpendicular if the lines are intersecting and their dot product is 00.

L1L2=0L_1\cdot L_2=0

skew if the lines are not parallel and not intersecting.

 
 

How to determine if two lines are parallel, intersecting (or perpendicular specifically), or skew


 
Krista King Math Signup.png
 
Calculus 3 course.png

Take the course

Want to learn more about Calculus 3? I have a step-by-step course for that. :)

 
 

 
 

Test for perpendicular first, then intersecting (then perpendicular if intersecting), and then skew

Example

Say whether the lines are parallel, intersecting, perpendicular or skew.

parallel, intersecting, perpendicular, or skew

We’ll start by testing the lines to see if they’re parallel by pulling out the coefficients

b1b2=d1d2=f1f2\frac{b_1}{b_2}=\frac{d_1}{d_2}=\frac{f_1}{f_2}

53=24=12\frac53=\frac24=\frac{1}{-2}

53=12=12\frac53=\frac12=\frac{1}{-2}

Since 5/31/21/25/3\neq1/2\neq-1/2, we know the lines are not parallel.

Because they’re not parallel, we’ll test to see whether or not they’re intersecting. We’ll set the equations for xx, yy, and zz from each line equal to each other. If we can find a solution set for the parameter values ss and tt, and this solution set satisfies all three equations, then we’ve proven that the lines are intersecting.

Setting x1=x2x_1=x_2, we get

x1=x2x_1=x_2

1+5t=2+3s1+5t=2+3s

5t=1+3s5t=1+3s

[1] t=15+35st=\frac15+\frac35s

Setting y1=y2y_1=y_2, we get

y1=y2y_1=y_2

[2] 3+2t=3+4s-3+2t=3+4s

Plugging [1] into [2] gives

3+2(15+35s)=3+4s-3+2\left(\frac15+\frac35s\right)=3+4s

3+25+65s=3+4s-3+\frac25+\frac65s=3+4s

6+25=4s65s-6+\frac25=4s-\frac65s

285=145s-\frac{28}{5}=\frac{14}{5}s

s=2814s=-\frac{28}{14}

[3] s=2s=-2

Plugging [3] into [1] gives

t=15+35(2)t=\frac15+\frac35(-2)

t=1565t=\frac15-\frac65

[4] t=1t=-1

Setting z1=z2z_1=z_2, we get

z1=z2z_1=z_2

[5] 1+t=32s1+t=3-2s

Plugging [3] and [4] into [5] gives

1+t=32s1+t=3-2s

1+(1)=32(2)1+(-1)=3-2(-2)

0=70=7

Since 070\neq7, the lines are not intersecting.

Because L1L_1 and L2L_2 are not parallel and not intersecting, by definition they must be skew.


Parallel, intersecting, skew, and perpendicular lines for Calculus 3.jpg

Two lines are intersecting if the lines are not parallel or if you can solve them as a system of simultaneous equations.

In the previous example, we didn’t test for perpendicularity because only intersecting lines can be perpendicular, and we found that the lines were not intersecting. If we had found that L1L_1 and L2L_2 were in fact perpendicular, we would have needed to test for perpendicularity by taking the dot product, like this:

L1L2=(1+5t)(2+3s)+(3+2t)(3+4s)+(1+t)(32s)L_1\cdot L_2=(1+5t)(2+3s)+(-3+2t)(3+4s)+(1+t)(3-2s)

L1L2=2+3s+10t+15st912s+6t+8st+32s+3t2stL_1\cdot L_2=2+3s+10t+15st-9-12s+6t+8st+3-2s+3t-2st

L1L2=21st11s+19t4L_1\cdot L_2=21st-11s+19t-4

021st11s+19t40\neq21st-11s+19t-4

Since the dot product isn’t 00, we’ve proven that the lines are not perpendicular.

 
Krista King.png
 

Get access to the complete Calculus 3 course